In the matter abovementioned ITAT deleted additions u/s 69A made on account of cash deposit during demonetization after ...
9. Pursuant to the order of the Delhi High Court dated 5th September, 2016 in P. (C) 7851/2016, the Deputy Commissioner ...
High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification No. 56/2023 Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section ...
Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside an unsigned GST assessment order issued to Sandhya Constructions for the period ...
3. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 23 February 2024, which is signed by Mr Virender Singh, Additional CIT (ITA Cell), CBDT, New Delhi, refusing to condone the delay of about 1585 days in ...
15. Since the Assessing Officer may not have required any further clarification, no video conferencing opportunity was granted to the Petitioner. Again, based on this material, we cannot hold that ...
Sections 147/148 remain applicable if AO opts not to invoke Section 153C: ITAT Mumbai upholds addition under Section 68 of ₹4.89 Cr.
The court highlighted that the concealment of material facts, coupled with the timing and arrangement of the transactions, justified the imposition of the penalty under Section 271 (1) (c). It ...
In Capital Property Consultants Vs ACIT, the Delhi High Court dealt with the issuance of multiple notices under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, highlighting procedural lapses by the ...
The AO initially passed an assessment order, making additions related to transfer pricing adjustments and disallowance under Section 14A. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under Section 147 ...
An order requiring CBDT’s approval must be explicitly issued by CBDT or its members: Bombay HC ...
The Finance Bill 2025 proposes 11 significant amendments to GST provisions, addressing anomalies and introducing new mechanisms. Effective April 2025, input tax credit (ITC) distribution by input ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback